Smart Transport

Electric bus design standardisation: Finding the right balance in the design standardisation debate

Two buses side by side

Author: Roger Brereton, head of sales at Pailton Engineering, weighs in on the debate for greater electric bus design standardisation.

A number of European cities have committed to securing only zero-emission buses by 2025.

However, to achieve this objective, manufacturers must make bold design choices, radically changing bus componentry, systems, and bodywork. 

In a 2018 report on the Design of Urban Electric Bus Systems, a morphological matrix method was applied to illustrate the complexity of designing an electric bus system.

All relevant electric bus technologies and charging systems were analysed, leading to over 100,000 different system options which were theoretically possible and technically feasible.

It is safe to say that the transformation process from diesel to electric bus systems opens up an extremely polarising design realm.

This design space offers bus original equipment manufacturers (OEMs) many opportunities to innovate, but prompts several challenges that also need addressing.

Chinese bus OEMs have established conventional technologies and a world-beating cost base, thanks to large subsidies.

This manufacturing knowledge has spread globally, with Europe selling over 1,800 electric buses in 2019 — an increase of 1,050 from the year prior.

So, against this backdrop, is greater design standardisation needed?

One standardisation debate revolves around battery design — the chemistry and the placement.

Battery chemistry has a direct impact on an electric bus’s range and charging speed — technology that has often fallen short.

As a possible solution, next-generation battery technologies such as solid-state (SSB) and lithium-sulphur are gaining momentum, but with investments already made in Li-ion technology, how quickly can these alternatives be brought to market?

When a technology is in its infancy, applying too many design constraints, especially ones that are solely cost focussed, can negatively affect the ability to tackle problems such as electric bus range.

On the other hand, some structural constraints are essential, such as defining the maximum weight of a component to make sure the typical bus empty weight correlates with the recommendations for the specific body type.

For example, chassis designers may be required to manufacture lighter bespoke parts to accommodate an increase in battery weight.

Non-standard design options for bus parts, such as those provided by a specialist, will help bus OEMs develop innovative systems while also keeping buses light and efficient.

Charging systems also fall into the electric bus standardisation debate.

In 2019, a report enabling e-bus interoperability testing was released by ASSURED.

This project, co-funded by the European Commission (EC), set out to promote the electrification of urban transport vehicles.

This has brought the standardisation of electric bus charging one step closer and could bring economic benefits to operators thanks to the ability to charge buses from different manufacturers at the same charging point.

The standard charging will also have a positive effect on the resale value of vehicles.

While the case for electric bus charging standardisation is compelling, it’s clear that too much design standardisation could negatively impact a technology that is still in its infancy.

Each design decision has positives and drawbacks regarding technological design complexity, capital and operational cost.

In an ideal world, a holistic electric bus design would analyse the requirements of the specific bus system, including the daily operation range, distance of trips, terrain and idle time at end stops.

However, electric bus design needs to be considered in its wider infrastructure context, which requires a certain level of design standardisation.

Electric bus technology development still has a long way to go, but it’s clear that innovative OEMs and electric bus parts suppliers will have a crucial role to play in the electric mass transportation future.

Watch now: Connecting Policy To Solutions Virtual Conference 2021

Smart Transport Conference returned on June 8th & 9th, to facilitate pivotal discussions on the future of transport. 

The UK’s most senior public and private sector transport leaders discussed the impact of Covid-19, achieving the Government’s decarbonisation ambitions, the need for more efficient living and better health, and much more.

Kwasi Kwarteng, secretary of state at the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS), who spoke on BEIS's approach to decarbonising transport, particularly the electrification of the vehicle industry. Watch his presentation below:


Most popular articles in Opinion

Comment as guest

Login  /  Register


No comments have been made yet.

Related content

Office Address
  • Smart Transport
    Media House
    Lynch Wood
    PE2 6EA
Join the community
  • Smart Transport is the UK's most important brand to bring together senior public policy makers and influential private sector leaders to showcase real-time solutions aligned to government policy.
  • Find out more
  • Insight


Welcome to Smart Transport

Welcome to the Smart Transport website, keeping you up-to-date with the latest news, insight and reports from policymakers and thought leaders.

The Smart Transport brand connects policy to solutions by bringing national government and local authority policymakers together with private sector organisations.

Contact Lindsay Greatbatch for more information.

© Bauer Consumer Media Ltd
Media House, Lynch Wood, Peterborough, PE2 6EA - Registered number 01176085 IPSO regulated logo


Smart Transport members

Smart Transport board members


Please note:
By submitting any material to us you are confirming that the material is your own original work or that you have permission from the copyright owner to use the material and to authorise Bauer Consumer Media to use it as described in this paragraph. You also promise that you have permission from anyone featured or
referred to in the submitted material to it being used by Bauer Consumer Media. If Bauer Consumer Media receives a claim from a copyright owner or a person
featured in any material you have sent us, we will inform that person that you have granted us permission to use the relevant material and you will be responsible for paying any amounts due to the copyright owner or featured person and/or for reimbursing Bauer Consumer Media for any losses it has suffered as a result.